Comment on If we cannot define “museums,” how do museums survive? by Lyndall Linaker

I agree with much that you are saying throughout the article. As a museum professional I found the second definition unattractive – I get the sentiment but there are too many words. There are times when the bigger museums forget about staying relevant and the fact that they are “for the people” but the smaller volunteer museums can over step the mark and do the same, repelling visitors by only accepting visitors who are like them. I wrote a blog post a few years ago about Museums in the 21st Century on Museum Whisperings and my view is still the same, that museums are about being “connected” – museums to their own collections and museums to their audiences. Nothing is static. Collections must be researched and reinterpreted and audiences need to be studied and nurtured so that they keep coming back. Museums are about connecting their visions and collections (or exhibitions if there is no collection) with the public to share knowledge and shape/reflect community values or discuss issues which may add value in a place that is safe for all.