• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Home

The May 13 Group

the next day for evaluation

  • Get Involved
  • Our Work
  • About Us
You are here: Home / allblogs / freshspectrum / Evaluation Ethics Fails, 7 illustrations

Feb 27 2024

Evaluation Ethics Fails, 7 illustrations

I’m sick this week, so instead of writing something new, I thought I republish something valuable from 11 years ago. This cartoon was inspired through a conversation with my good friend Ann K. Emery.

This was back when Ann was a full time evaluator and before the launch of her super successful training academy and professional development business Depict Data Studio [affiliate link].

All of the comics shared in this post are based on true stories…which is probably why they hold up so well!

Low Response Rate

Evaluator: “Here are the survey results for your program. The results suggest that _____, but here’s a caveat – there was a low response rate, so we need to take these results with a grain of salt.”

Client: “No problem. Send me the link to the survey. I’ll take the survey a dozen times, and then the response rate will be higher.”

Evaluator: “Sorry, that’s not how it works.”

Client: “Then give me a paper copy of the survey and I’ll make photocopies until we have enough responses.”

Impossible response rate

Formatting Issue

Evaluator: “Here are the results from your program.”

Client: “Uh oh, the results don’t look good. The graphs aren’t going up. Can you re-format the graph to make sure all the bars are going upwards over time?”

Don't look at the axis

Defining Outlier

Evaluators: “Here are the results from your program.”

Client: “Those results aren’t accurate.”

Evaluators: “How so?”

Client: “The bad results are obviously outliers. You need to remove those people from the sample.”

Evaluators: “We define an outlier as (1.5 x the interquartile range) below quartile 1 or above quartile 3. Other evaluators define outliers as 3 standard deviations above or below the mean. We checked, and those people are not outliers. In fact, their experience in the program was pretty typical.”

Client: “Sorry, I didn’t realize it was such a hassle to fix. I didn’t mean to create more work for you. Just send me the Word version of your report and I’ll delete that section myself.”

Outlier is someone who doesn't like our program

Whoops Typo

Evaluator: “Here are the results.”

Client: “I know our program only had a 38% success rate, but can you type 83% in the report to our funders? 83% sounds better than 38%. If anybody notices, just say you accidentally made a typo.”

Report written on backwards day

Staying Funded

One more cartoon, just to put the fails in context…

You better show great results

Additional Cartoons

I’m curious, what ethics fails have you witnessed? Anything you can share or would you need the blurry picture and garbled voice treatment too?

Update 1: Cherry-Picked Sample

Thanks to Maria Gajewski for the comment that inspired this cartoon!

My favorite is the cherry-picked sample. I was involved in a project where directors only wanted to survey students whose families were still involved in the program. It’s not too difficult to figure out families who had a bad experience would not remain with the program, but the directors just couldn’t seem to grasp this when I pointed it out!

Next time, send this cartoon to the directors 🙂

Cherry Picking Sample

 

Update 2: Consequences

Ok, here is another comment inspired cartoon (thanks bridgetjones52).  And a big thank you to everyone else for all the comments and shares!

When presenting results of evaluation, very very senior manager ‘informed’ us that there would be consequences!!!

wpid-Photo-Jun-26-2013-131-PM.jpg

Written by cplysy · Categorized: freshspectrum

Related Posts

You may be interested in these posts from the same category.

[grid content=”post” taxonomy=”category” terms=”current” exclude_current=”true” number=”12″ gutter=”10″ align=”center” slider=”true” center_mode=”true”]

Footer

Follow our Work

The easiest way to stay connected to our work is to join our newsletter. You’ll get updates on projects, learn about new events, and hear stories from those evaluators whom the field continues to actively exclude and erase.

Get Updates

Want to take further action or join a pod? Click here to learn more.

Copyright © 2026 · The May 13 Group · Log in

en English
af Afrikaanssq Shqipam አማርኛar العربيةhy Հայերենaz Azərbaycan dilieu Euskarabe Беларуская моваbn বাংলাbs Bosanskibg Българскиca Catalàceb Cebuanony Chichewazh-CN 简体中文zh-TW 繁體中文co Corsuhr Hrvatskics Čeština‎da Dansknl Nederlandsen Englisheo Esperantoet Eestitl Filipinofi Suomifr Françaisfy Fryskgl Galegoka ქართულიde Deutschel Ελληνικάgu ગુજરાતીht Kreyol ayisyenha Harshen Hausahaw Ōlelo Hawaiʻiiw עִבְרִיתhi हिन्दीhmn Hmonghu Magyaris Íslenskaig Igboid Bahasa Indonesiaga Gaeilgeit Italianoja 日本語jw Basa Jawakn ಕನ್ನಡkk Қазақ тіліkm ភាសាខ្មែរko 한국어ku كوردی‎ky Кыргызчаlo ພາສາລາວla Latinlv Latviešu valodalt Lietuvių kalbalb Lëtzebuergeschmk Македонски јазикmg Malagasyms Bahasa Melayuml മലയാളംmt Maltesemi Te Reo Māorimr मराठीmn Монголmy ဗမာစာne नेपालीno Norsk bokmålps پښتوfa فارسیpl Polskipt Portuguêspa ਪੰਜਾਬੀro Românăru Русскийsm Samoangd Gàidhligsr Српски језикst Sesothosn Shonasd سنڌيsi සිංහලsk Slovenčinasl Slovenščinaso Afsoomaalies Españolsu Basa Sundasw Kiswahilisv Svenskatg Тоҷикӣta தமிழ்te తెలుగుth ไทยtr Türkçeuk Українськаur اردوuz O‘zbekchavi Tiếng Việtcy Cymraegxh isiXhosayi יידישyo Yorùbázu Zulu