• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Home

The May 13 Group

the next day for evaluation

  • Get Involved
  • Our Work
  • About Us
You are here: Home / Archives for allblogs

allblogs

Jun 04 2020

Ethical Decision Making in Evaluation

 

Evaluations are inherently political, which means they are fraught with ethical choices and decisions along the way. There have been many instances throughout my career where I get that uneasy feeling, my gut talking to me and telling me to slow down and re-think what I am doing. I’ve learned that when I do, a devil appears on my left shoulder and starts yelling:

 

“WHAT ARE YOU DOING? YOU DON’T HAVE TIME FOR THIS! YOU’RE GOING TO GO WAY OVER BUDGET DOING THIS – KEEP GOING! SO WHAT IF YOU DON’T HEAR FROM THOSE PEOPLE? SO WHAT IF THAT PUTS THEM AT RISK?”

 

And then the angel on my right shoulder appears. Thank goodness! We all know from the movies that I’m supposed to listen to her. I slow down even more and listen intently:

“Do the right thing,” she whispers.

Uh-huh, okay. I keep listening for more….

That’s it?! What in the hell (excuse my language, angel), does that mean? In my evaluation experience I have been faced with numerous situations where I know I should do “the right thing,” but more times than not the decisions we face are not black and white or right and wrong.

For example:

….during evaluation planning, we don’t have the resources to answer all questions from all stakeholders – how do we decide how to focus the evaluation? Whose needs will we address and whose will we leave out? Is it appropriate to focus evaluation questions on funder needs and burden program staff and participants with collecting and reporting information that is not important or useful to them? Is it enough for funders to check the box and say, “the program was a success –  good for us,” but has little benefit for program staff and participants? 

….during data collection, we may be inclined to take the easier path to get the data we need to answer our questions. We may ask ourselves, “do I really need to include that group?” Trying to access that group and get their informed consent could burn a lot of time and resources. Is it right to exclude them and only provide the perspective of others?

….during analysis and reporting, what do we do if our stakeholders suggest we present findings  in an alternative (i.e. more favourable) way? This happens far more often than I would like, but stakeholders are called stakeholders for a reason  – they have a stake in whatever it is you are evaluating. We conducted an evaluation of a program a few years ago and from the start were informed that the livelihood of this program depended on favourable evaluation results. When we uncovered and reported what they perceived as negative findings, the stakeholders of course pushed back on those findings. As evaluators, we have a responsibility to present the data (both positive and negative); however, the reality is, anyone who has worked as an evaluator knows that data isn’t just data (yes, even quantitative data). As Michael Quinn Patton states in his book Utilization-Focused Evaluation, “data always requires interpretation. Interpretation is only partly logical and deductive; it’s also value laden and perspective dependent.” Conversations are never really about reporting if the results get presented, but more of a back and forth of how and to what extent.

So, what is an evaluator to do?

Here are some things that have helped me silence the devil on my left shoulder and figure out what my angel means:

Program Evaluation Standards

There are standards that have been created to help guide the way for evaluators. The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (JCSEE) developed Program Evaluation Standards that have been adopted by evaluation associations in the United States and Canada. The Standards provide guidance both for evaluators in planning and implementing their program evaluation projects, and for evaluation users in knowing what to expect from the evaluation process and products. Check out our free 6-page resource that provides evaluators with reflective questions for each of the Standards. 

JCSEE+Eval+Standards+in+Practice+Preview.png


Alberta Innovates ARRECI

ARECCI Ethics Screening Process

ARECCI Ethics Screening Process

– Most researchers have access to a research ethics board to review and approve — or not — their research projects. However, evaluators are often turned away by research ethics boards – after all they are “research” ethics boards. Nonetheless, evaluation still involves people, information and potential risk to participants. In our home province, Alberta Innovates has created an ethical framework for evaluation and other innovation projects in Alberta. ARECCI stands for A pRoject Ethics Community Consensus Initiative. This collaborative initiative has developed a screening tool that helps identify what your project is (i.e. research, evaluation, QI) and an ethics guideline tool. Even if you are an evaluator outside of Alberta, these tools are useful for identifying risk to participants and helping you make decisions that will protect people and their information.  


Evaluator colleagues and community

When you’re not sure, ask! At Three Hive, we are lucky to work on a team where we can bounce ideas and questions off each other. In addition, my business partner, Shelby Corley, is what Alberta Innovates calls a Second Opinion Reviewer, which means she has received additional training on reviewing projects for ethical risk and ways to mitigate risk. If you’re an independent consultant and don’t have your own in-house ethical angel, then reach out to the evaluator community. As you know, evaluators love giving recommendations! Start an #evalTwitter on Twitter, post a question on EvalCentral, or join some evaluation groups on LinkedIn and post your questions. While standards are useful, you will get far more real-world practical advice from your fellow evaluators.

If you’re still at a loss, sometimes you just have to re-visit that gut feeling. Maybe my angel wasn’t saying “do the right thing” but “do what feels right” (it is so hard to hear with that noisy devil sometimes!). As Ernest Hemingway said:

 

“So far, about morals, I know only that what is moral is what you feel good after and what is immoral is what you feel bad after.”

 


Sign up for our newsletter

We’ll let you know about our new content, and curate the best new evaluation resources from around the web!


We respect your privacy.

Thank you!


 

Written by cplysy · Categorized: evalacademy

Jun 04 2020

Evaluation as Protest

Ahmaud Arbery. Sean Reed. Breonna Taylor. Tony McDade. George Floyd. When does this racial terror end?

For the past three months, our communities have been inundated with painful stories and images of Black people targeted, harassed, arrested, and killed by police and racist vigilantes. As Black people all across the country grapple with the aftermath of an unprecedented global pandemic, somehow Black people also have to figure how to stay alive while jogging, buying groceries, and yes — even while sleeping.

Color of Change – State of Emergency: End the War on Black people!

It should never have taken this amount of publicly shared violence to engage white people like me in active anti-racism. I appropriately sit with that discomfort thinking of moments across my life where I could have, and should have, said something or done something to show opposition.

I know I am not alone, and many of my dear readers are thinking the same. I’ve spent the last week signing petitions, following up with friends, donating to anti-racist causes, and calling out racist posts from extended family and childhood friends. Going to facebook for me is like visiting my hometown and feeling uncomfortable in the overwhelming whiteness. I hate it, but burying it deep within and pretending it’s not a part of me won’t make it go away.

<Someone’s comment on my comment> Calling someone or something racist, is the last resort of an idiot.”

<My response> in my defense, it was my first resort to call the string of racist memes racist.”

Excerpt from a recent comment conversation I had on Facebook. Basically I called a cousin out on a string of racist memes he was sharing, then had an opportunity to exchange pleasantries with him and his friends…

But as my wife and I sat discussing what we could do to be better allies and accomplices, I started to think about how we could embrace our evaluation skill-set to support anti-racism efforts in a systematic and practical way.

So that’s what this post is. It is a brainstorm on action-oriented contributions. It’s not complete, so if you would like to add your own thoughts, please do.

I offer these observations as one human clinging onto her hopes for humanity.

I invite each of us to remember and unleash our humanity in the work we need to do to make us worthy of this planet and each other.

My simmering rage both fuels and exhausts me. It keeps me alive with a deeper level of understanding in my body and in my soul not just in my head of what is at stake: Everything.

Jara Dean-Coffey from her post on the Equitable Evaluation Initiative website: Embodied Knowledge: Simmering Rage | A note from Luminare Group Founder & EEI Director

To my BIPOC readers, colleagues, and friends.

I pledge to be a supportive ally and accomplice.

Your life matters. Your family’s lives matters. Your friend’s lives matter.

This is no little problem that will away go away when things “return to normal.” The evidence of inequality between BIPOC and white members of this country is pervasive a deep.

I am nowhere near perfect, but I will always listen. Even if the conversation is hard.

Reminder: check on your Black friends, family, colleagues, and students. We are not ok. A few have asked me what could/should this look like? Be honest, be vulnerable, be compassionate. Here are screen shots of an email I sent to my students and colleagues of African descent. pic.twitter.com/KVVJayflDi

— Ayesha Boyce (@AyeshaBoyce) June 1, 2020

My digital office door is always open. I usually say that I offer one 30 minute consultation for free. But that’s pretty much bunk, we can chat longer and it could be more sessions.

In other words, if you ever want to chat, I’m here. And I’m not going to try to sell you on anything. But I can make a pretty good thought partner.

Things I’m particularly good at for thought partnering:

  • Coming up with digital strategies.
  • Designing digital training programs.
  • Evaluating digital efforts.
  • Actionable data reporting.

Breaking the Cycle

It’s not a new problem.

It’s just being caught on tape.

Breaking the cycle starts with understanding that a cycle exists.

What is James Baldwin thinking more than 50 years after this interview, which could be written today? (You will notice that nothing I post anywhere in my own words started with me–it is common knowledge among BIPOC thinkers and writers and artists. White investment in individualism means that white leadership always tries to individuate themselves from these repeated patterns of behavior–they are somehow different–even when they demonstrate the documented behavior.)

A post from Vidhya Shanker on LinkedIn.

Working within the Evaluation Guiding Principles

You want to know something neat about being evaluator. Most of the time we work for a client who is paying us to evaluate a program or activity. Or we work for an agency that is paying us to evaluate a whole set of programs or activities. The majority of the time, we receive compensation for our work.

But if you read our guiding principles, you’ll see very little specifically connected to how we serve our bill-paying clients. Our client is only one part of the broader stakeholder groups we serve.

You don’t need a client to evaluate a program and deliver professional services. You just need stakeholders.

So why not use our skills as evaluators to systematically evaluate programs as we strive to contribute to the common good, regardless of whether or not the targeted programs have requested our services.

We just need stakeholders.

Short Version of the AEA Guiding Principles

A. Systematic Inquiry: Evaluators conduct data-based inquiries that are thorough, methodical, and contextually relevant.

B. Competence: Evaluators provide skilled professional services to stakeholders.

C. Integrity: Evaluators behave with honesty and transparency in order to ensure the integrity of the evaluation.

D. Respect for People: Evaluators honor the dignity, well-being, and self-worth of individuals and acknowledge the influence of culture within and across groups.

E. Common Good and Equity: Evaluators strive to contribute to the common good and advancement of an equitable and just society.

Stakeholders – individuals, groups, or organizations served by, or with a legitimate interest in, an evaluation including those who might be affected by an evaluation.

Full Version AEA Guiding Principles [PDF]Download

Sharing Evidence to Guide Practice

I get asked a lot for best practices in evidence sharing. Organizations that do a good job of sharing data in an actionable format.

Campaign ZERO’s website is that (JoinCampaignZERO.org). This is information design at its best. If you have data and evidence to share that you hope could become actionable, I suggest treating this site as a blueprint for how it’s done.

My favorite page on the site is the solutions page. Here is how it’s structured.

  • It starts with a quick overview and index. The visual is a breakdown of 10 individual solutions (which are color coded into 3 different mega-categories).
  • Clicking on individual solution categories will take you to individual solution focused-pages. But all information is also shared by scrolling down. This allows you to link to and share individual solutions, but also to lazy scroll through everything (IMPORTANT for digital engagement).
  • As you scroll down through the solutions you are aided by a simple bullet point sidebar menu for quick jumps.
  • Each solution section starts with an image (IMPORTANT for digital sharing and reader orientation).
  • An intro paragraph gives a summary, equipped with a soundbite style data point (AWESOME for Social Sharing).
  • Individual Solutions are Icon Illustrated. Supporting examples and evidence are linked.
  • The section ends with linked research. It features a high authority source mix of news/magazine articles and journal articles. All research is accessible by clicking (and not hidden behind academic paywalls).
  • And finally, the whole site is built on SquareSpace. You don’t need a super expensive custom developed website to share data and evidence.

Campaign ZERO was developed with contributions from activists, protesters and researchers across the nation. This data-informed platform presents comprehensive solutions to end police violence in America. It integrates community demands and policy recommendations from research organizations and President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Together, we will win.

The Campaign Zero Planning Team (a.k.a. amazing people you should really follow on Twitter):
@deray, 33, is a protestor, dedicated to ending police and state violence.
@samswey, 29, is data scientist who leads the development of research, digital tools and platforms to end police violence and systemic racism in America.
@MsPackyetti, 33, is a St. Louis native raised in a tradition of social justice.

Localizing Critical Data

You can compare your city/state and download the full database at MappingPoliceViolence.org

I want to mention two more sites from the same team who brought us Campaign Zero.

The first is MappingPoliceViolence.org

This site uses secondary sources to map police violence across the country. The data combines products of crowd-sourced sources with original research to paint a picture not currently shared by law enforcement agencies. The methodology is fully transparent and the full database is available for download.

The second is PoliceScorecard.org

The Police Scorecard provides a deep dive into the actions and policies for police forces in California. The score card, which grades individual police departments, is systematic and transparent in its evaluative approach. The overall mission is to expand the work nationwide.

Crime data is collected and reported much in the same way as it has for the last two decades. Seriously, not an overstatement. In the year 2000 I was a criminology major in undergrad. Looking at the Uniform Crime Reporting data and the National Victimization Crime Survey data creates flashbacks to my college days.

Sites like Mapping Police Violence exist because our current national data systems do not answer important evaluative questions in a meaningful way (if at all).

Ask some questions and try to find the answers. You shouldn’t need a Masters and two decades of data experience to find them. We also can’t wait for the bureaucracy to get their data act together.

Start local. Find the answers. Share the answers.

Break down the cryptic national data and put it into local context. Then working with social justice organizations in your area, share the data in a digestible format. Here are some examples of questions that should be easy to answer, but often are not.

  • What police departments exist in your area?
  • Is the police department demographically representative of the local area?
  • Has the police department been involved in a shooting?
  • Is there evidence that suggests racial profiling in arrests?

Adapting Data for Social Sharing

How many clicks does it take you to find the data you want to find?

Lots of potentially useful data gets buried in poorly designed public websites and warehouses.

But if you are the kind of person who can adapt this information into useful guidance, it’s worth time and effort to explore these public sources. Yes, it would be great if our public organizations prioritized useful dissemination efforts. But we can’t wait for that happen.

Here is one way you can take data you find and adapt it into a useful format.

  • Think of an audience you would like to reach. For example, a local mayor’s office or county executive.
  • Think of a finding you believe might influence or move them to action.
  • Find a simple template in Canva for a social media post or presentation.
  • Create an image that shares data for that specific audience. Annotate that data, mention the audience and others who you believe could help the chart reach its intended target.

Rubric Supported Digital Content Analysis

In the modern era, websites and social media streams are the digital manifestations of a police department’s strategy. You “should” be able to find quite a bit about the policies and overall composition of an agency through reviews of publicly available information.

A scroll through a website is not a bad place to start deciphering a department’s strategy. But as an evaluator, you can do it systematically.

Create a basic rubric. It could be as simple as a list of questions you have about the department’s policies. (Such as, does this police department employ the use of body cameras or does it train on de-escalation techniques?). Then systematically go question to question, sourcing the specific answers as you go. Also rate based on the completeness of the answers (such as answered, partially answered, incomprehensible, or no information provided).

You could then take a further step, sharing your findings with the police department and asking them to fill in the blanks. Or you could report as it is, since complete or not this is the public face of the department.

Wondering what you might want to review? Building off the work of others is always the best place to start when available. Again I will advocate for Campaign ZERO.

Modeling Systems of Oppression and White Supremacy

Evaluators love logic models.

But for the most part we tend to develop models based on program activities designed to bring positive change.

But what if you believe that the system is not broken and in need of a fix. It’s working exactly as designed (to help the rich grow richer and maintain white supremacy).

Therefore the working systems of oppression need to be broken.

Use the skills you have to model white supremacy. Instead of creating a theory of change, develop a theory of oppression. Understanding how our systems and societal structures perpetuate inequality and maintain white supremacy is a step towards breaking the harmful causal mechanisms.

Systematically Documenting Community Stakeholder Experience

The world is complex.

One way to jump into that is to develop super sophisticated, and often utterly confusing, diagrams or algorithms in an attempt to map out our analyze through the complexity.

But an easier way I find is to put a focus on the stakeholders of interest. Tell the story of a person showing how they navigate a system you are trying to change. Then do it over and over, with different people.

Be intentional, and systematic. Document your approach and your methods.

For instance, what if you started with a black male high school sophomore with college aspirations. Given his age and home life, start pulling together the descriptive data on outcomes and challenges.

Think through current events. What is the likelihood that he would join his peers in a local peaceful protest near a downtown church? Then maybe face tear gas and rubber bullets as the police attempt to clear the path for a presidential photo opportunity.

Human lives are complex. Stories are data.

Single stories can be powerful. Collections of stories built systematically over time integrating numbers, images, and video can be hard to ignore.

With cell phones everywhere, more individual stories are coming to light. Reporters report and move on, it’s the way their field is designed. But as an evaluator, you can collect and synthesize.

Evidence Supported Political Activism

You can, and should, be in touch with your political representatives.

Let them know what you think.

But if you want to strengthen your argument. Bring data to your calls, to your emails, to your tweets, and your comments.

What other ways do you think we can leverage our skills as evaluators to support anti-racist actions?

This was all just a brainstorm. There is so much more we can do. Would love to hear your thoughts.

Written by cplysy · Categorized: freshspectrum

Jun 03 2020

Evaluation for Change

Change is everywhere it seems and while it can be said it is the only constant what we are seeing is an increase of change on a massive scale.

However, as the protesters across the United States, Canada and beyond are making clear: there is a big difference between talk of change, the process of change, and the outcome of change efforts. Evaluation can be a powerful tool to help us distinguish these things together as they can be conflated too easily.

Here are three things to consider when seeking to make these distinctions that can be applied anytime, but become more salient when focused on large-scale change efforts where much is happening simultaneously.

Document your baseline

A baseline is a starting point and while it would be great to have data from yesterday, if we are seeking to gather change-related data today that means this is your baseline. Too often baselines are forgotten because any effort to measure or track change needs to answer the question: change in relation to what?

How? Pick the most convenient, proximate moment to gather data. Aim to capture descriptive data of what is happening, time data (see below), and also any numerical aspects of the phenomenon you can. These can be such things as cases of something, number of participants involved, descriptions of the current situation. From this, you can later build a backstory that can help lead to the present moment.

For example, George Floyd was arrested and killed by a police officer on May 25, 2020. It is possible to use that as a baseline for what came next and later build the backstory by showing the many different incidents of a similar nature that may have happened locally, nationally, and beyond to illustrate historical patterns of things like police behaviour, protests, violence, racism or otherwise depending on what changes one seeks to make.

Gather real-time data whenever possible

It’s tempting to gather data after an event (e.g., protest, policy decision, etc.) has taken place (and sometimes that’s unavoidable), however, there is much evidence that we lose perspective and critical information in our post-event reflections that often fail to capture critical details of what actually happens.

How? During the COVID-19 pandemic we have seen many examples of this with live reports from doctors, nurses, and other caregivers working the front-lines of healthcare responses. We’ve seen infectious disease specialists giving interviews on television, exchanging data and opinion via email and Twitter, and through first-hand accounts of citizens dealing with the various policy decisions made. These micro-narratives can make for a strong experiential case for what is happening and what effects the event is having. Reviewing social media posts, proposing online diaries (e.g., selfie video testimonials) or using ‘speakers corner‘ sites or physical booths to allow people to document what they feel, think, say, and do in real-time will provide a more accurate and adaptive means of understanding what is happening as it happens, rather than just retrospectively.

Timestamp your data

Time is a critical contextual factor that can help us understand what happens, why it happens when it does, and to better make sense of the outcomes. The Greeks classified two types of time: Chronos (‘clock time’) and Kairos (‘relative’ time) . Determining what time (as in hour, date etc..) can help you to organize things in chronological order and see relationships between change-making efforts. Relative time — proximity — helps us see the effect of certain activities in relation to others.

How? Modern recording tools often have this built into them, but for the evaluator it is important to record when things happen and document the sequencing of things. Big events like the two we’ve used — the race riots and pandemic — have so many moving parts that it quickly gets difficult to remember retrospectively what happened in what order. This is critical if we want to develop a theory of change or explain what happened as part of the change process.

These three things are all simple and can be done with tools like phone cameras and gathering things in a spreadsheet. More sophisticated ways are available as well and, ideally, there is a method and plan prior to a change initiative taking place. But as we’ve seen, sometimes change just happens. If it does, you’ll be ready to capture it and learn from it before it comes to pass and be able to tell if it doesn’t.

Stay and be safe.

If change is something you need help understanding and documenting, don’t hesitate to reach out and contact us. Evaluating, supporting, and guiding change efforts is what we do.

Photo by mana5280 on Unsplash

Written by cplysy · Categorized: cameronnorman

Jun 03 2020

Unbecoming & reimagining: Leaning into values and fears

This blog post has been a long time coming. I have struggled with voicing my thoughts for a couple of years. I am embarrassed that it took a national crisis and more murders of people of color like Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd for me to lean into the fear and vulnerability to write. I am ashamed that I became afraid to use my voice publicly for justice and equity for fear of losing potential clients when people are losing their lives. I recognize that these fears, while real for me, are a privilege. This guilt, shame, and embarrassment are also privileges — white privilege. I have privilege simply because of the color of my skin, and I need to intentionally and consistently use that privilege to enact change.

Written by cplysy · Categorized: elizabethgrim

Jun 02 2020

Reaching Youth Where They Are

CCAPSA Youth Advisory Team
Hi everyone-
So many community-based prevention programs are trying to pivot, to change the way they are working in communities in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic. Since prevention and nonprofit leaders who work with youth can’t go into schools, churches, or community-based afterschool programs at this time, they must get creative in order to reach teens.  
 
In this week’s blog, I am joined today by my client, LaTreece Roby. LaTreece is the Program Director for the Cobb County Alliance to Prevent Substance Abuse (CCAPSA). LaTreece leads a federally-funded Drug-free Coalition and a state-funded Alcohol & Substance Abuse Prevention Project. Both efforts aim to reduce underage drinking through environmental change strategies.

A couple of weeks ago, I asked LaTreece to join me on a call with some of my other substance abuse prevention clients because LaTreece is an absolute Rockstar when it comes to technology and social media to reach the youth. She is a big believer in going to where our youth are. In this blog, I want to share some of her tips.
 
LaTreece often says that kids are already on social media, so why not go to where they are?
 
One of the first thing that CCAPSA did to increase community engagement was to purchase ads on 200 shopping carts in two different grocery stores. These ads included a “call to action” prompting parents to opt into a text back program. The effort, which cost about $4500 for the year, resulting in 60 people signing up for the campaign in the first 30 days.
 
CCAPSA uses a program called CityGro to manage their text back campaign. The parents who choose to connect to the coalition, receive weekly conversation starters like, “Spring break is around the corner. Try asking your teen how they feel about alcohol and spring parties.” or “E-cigarettes are becoming increasingly more popular. Start the conversation with your child by asking them what do they know about the dangers of vaping.” The coalition is steadily increasing the number of community members who are opting into the campaign.
 
The coalition is maximizing its reach through strategically planning events with community partners.  In partnership with Georgia Prevention Project and their college advisory council,  the coalition was able to co-hosted a “virtual” Rx drug take back day. Takeback days are usually sponsored by the https://www.dea.gov (DEA) but since those are not happening right now, the partners sponsored a Facebook live event and had 1500 people tune in. Through the integration of survey monkey and CCAPSA’s website, his event resulted in local community members being able to request packets of a prescription drug disposal solution that had been donated to the coalition. 

CCAPSA uses Instagram, Snap Chat and Tik Tok because these are the platforms that youth interact with on a daily basis. LaTreece’s advice to my coalition leaders was to go where the kids are.  LaTreece also advised the leaders that when trying to increase Instagram followers the easiest method is the, “I follow you; you follow me back method.” Youth typically follow this unwritten.  This makes searching hashtags that include local high school names or popular local attractions an easy way to lead you to future Instagram followers in your area. LaTreece wanted the group to remember, especially for those of us who are a little bit older, that the youth today are digital natives. They’ve grown up in a digital world. Teens consume and rapidly obtain information in the palm of their hand. Social media is a good way to get good information to them.  
 
Before the pandemic, the youth advisory councils used QR codes on posters, cards and info graphics to disseminate prevention content to their friends and lead them the coalitions social media platforms. Even amidst the pandemic, the coalition has been successful in engaging youth. Every Thursday at 12 o’clock they host “Teen Talk” with their Youth Advisory Council, sometimes having more than 30 students joining. They use GroupMe as a way to keep continuous contact with the students and remind the students about Teen Talk.  The coalition had a partnership with Kennesaw State University and the “Adopt a School” program.  This program provided 6 KSU student mentors to work on opioid prevention projects with the youth advisory council. These KSU students were instrumental in keeping the teens engaged during the Teen Talks. During one talk, the KSU students used kahoot.com to create a game that incorporated themes from popular tv shows and music into a trivia game educating on opioid misuse.  A few weeks ago, I joined and gave a mini-webinar on developing good survey questions. CCPASA leaders make the activities fun and interactive and it’s their youth that are making key decisions. The adults are there just to bounce ideas off of and make sure things stay appropriate.

LaTreece’s last reminder to the group is that teens often feel unsupported by their communities and by schools. So LaTreece’s advice is to connect with teens and make sure they feel supported. “We need to go where they are in terms of technology and learn to speak their language. There is a lot of harmful information that they have access to through Instagram, Snapchat and other online platforms. Why not spread messages of hope and positive lifestyles through those very same channels?”
 
Some of my other clients are putting LaTreece’s advice into practice please contact me or LaTreece if you need any more information.

Written by cplysy · Categorized: communityevaluationsolutions

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 259
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to page 261
  • Go to page 262
  • Go to page 263
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 310
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Follow our Work

The easiest way to stay connected to our work is to join our newsletter. You’ll get updates on projects, learn about new events, and hear stories from those evaluators whom the field continues to actively exclude and erase.

Get Updates

Want to take further action or join a pod? Click here to learn more.

Copyright © 2026 · The May 13 Group · Log in

en English
af Afrikaanssq Shqipam አማርኛar العربيةhy Հայերենaz Azərbaycan dilieu Euskarabe Беларуская моваbn বাংলাbs Bosanskibg Българскиca Catalàceb Cebuanony Chichewazh-CN 简体中文zh-TW 繁體中文co Corsuhr Hrvatskics Čeština‎da Dansknl Nederlandsen Englisheo Esperantoet Eestitl Filipinofi Suomifr Françaisfy Fryskgl Galegoka ქართულიde Deutschel Ελληνικάgu ગુજરાતીht Kreyol ayisyenha Harshen Hausahaw Ōlelo Hawaiʻiiw עִבְרִיתhi हिन्दीhmn Hmonghu Magyaris Íslenskaig Igboid Bahasa Indonesiaga Gaeilgeit Italianoja 日本語jw Basa Jawakn ಕನ್ನಡkk Қазақ тіліkm ភាសាខ្មែរko 한국어ku كوردی‎ky Кыргызчаlo ພາສາລາວla Latinlv Latviešu valodalt Lietuvių kalbalb Lëtzebuergeschmk Македонски јазикmg Malagasyms Bahasa Melayuml മലയാളംmt Maltesemi Te Reo Māorimr मराठीmn Монголmy ဗမာစာne नेपालीno Norsk bokmålps پښتوfa فارسیpl Polskipt Portuguêspa ਪੰਜਾਬੀro Românăru Русскийsm Samoangd Gàidhligsr Српски језикst Sesothosn Shonasd سنڌيsi සිංහලsk Slovenčinasl Slovenščinaso Afsoomaalies Españolsu Basa Sundasw Kiswahilisv Svenskatg Тоҷикӣta தமிழ்te తెలుగుth ไทยtr Türkçeuk Українськаur اردوuz O‘zbekchavi Tiếng Việtcy Cymraegxh isiXhosayi יידישyo Yorùbázu Zulu